Offsides Rule Controversy
Fans and players urge FIFA to review 'ridiculous' offsides rule at World Cup.
Anonymous
A goal canceled by a toenail. That is what Colombia's Davinson Sánchez experienced at the 2026 FIFA World Cup on June 27, when his stoppage-time header against Portugal was ruled offside after a three-minute video review — the margin so small it was invisible to the naked eye. The Spun and Hindustan Times reported that the Semi-Automated Offside Technology (SAOT) showed Sánchez's body barely crossing the line, sparking global outrage and calls for FIFA to change the rule.
The incident quickly went viral. Sports analyst Frank Isola posted on X: "The rule needs to be adjusted. This is ridiculous." Former England captain Wayne Rooney argued that marginal calls "undermine the spectacle," according to Essentially Sports. FIFA now faces mounting pressure to reform a rule that critics say has drifted far from its original purpose.
How a Toenail Became the World Cup's Biggest Villain
The Colombia-Portugal match was not an isolated case. Just one day earlier, on June 26, Iran's Shoja Khalilzadeh had a potential winner against Egypt wiped out — also by "a toe," according to Forbes. Both decisions came from SAOT, the same technology FIFA upgraded for 2026. The system uses 12 stadium cameras and tracks 29 points on each player's body. The Adidas Trionda match ball sends sensor data 500 times per second to the VAR room, The New Arab reported.
Critics call these "micro-offsides" — decisions measured in millimeters that no human official could ever spot. An independent referee analysis group, ArchivoVAR, went further. It claimed FIFA's system used the "wrong frame" for the Sánchez decision, selecting a moment after the ball had already left the passer's foot. Because the ball travels so fast, one frame — just 1/50th of a second — can shift a player's position by several centimeters, according to Tribuna.
Arsène Wenger's 'Daylight Rule' Already Being Tested in Canada
A potential fix is already being tried. On April 4, 2026, the Canadian Premier League (CPL) began the world's first professional trial of the "Daylight Offside" rule, backed by FIFA's own Arsène Wenger, according to The Guardian. Under this rule, a player is only offside if there is a clear, visible gap between them and the last defender. If any part of the attacker overlaps the defender, play continues.
The trial got its first real test on May 5, when Pacific FC striker Alejandro DÃaz scored the first-ever professional "Daylight" goal against Halifax Wanderers, The Guardian reported. Early results suggest the rule reduces controversy without producing a flood of easy goals. If the trial succeeds, IFAB — the body that writes soccer's laws — could vote to adopt it globally as early as the 2027/28 season.
FIFA Defends the Technology, but Fans Are Tuning Out
FIFA Chairman of Referees Pierluigi Collina has stood firm. He said "perfection is not our target... our target is efficiency," arguing that SAOT cuts review times from several minutes to just seconds, according to the Associated Press. FIFA President Gianni Infantino had told critics before the tournament to "chill and relax," France 24 reported. But the numbers tell a harder story: 176,000 tickets remained unsold in the resale portal as of late June, according to the Financial Times.
The 2026 World Cup is projected to generate $11 billion in profit for FIFA, according to Forbes. But analysts warn that repeated VAR interruptions — killing goal celebrations before they start — could hurt future media rights deals if fans decide the product is not worth watching. To fight "rigging" claims, FIFA has also introduced RefCam, a body camera worn by referees so fans can see what officials see, Global Times reported.
Two Sides of the Debate: Spirit of the Game vs. Black-and-White Rules
Supporters of the current rule say offside is simple: either you are over the line or you are not. Some fans compare it to a foul ball in baseball or a foot out-of-bounds in the NFL — a clear, binary call that should not have fuzzy edges, according to fan discussions tracked by The Spun. From this view, the technology just enforces a rule that has always existed. The problem, they argue, is not the rule — it is that players are now being caught breaking it precisely.
Critics fire back that the rule was never meant for this. The offside law was designed to stop "goal-hanging" — attackers camping near the net waiting for an easy tap-in. A margin of one or two centimeters gives no tactical advantage. Some analysts propose a "Tolerance Zone" — a margin of roughly 5 centimeters where the on-field call stands if technology cannot definitively overturn it, according to Athlon Sports. The debate will not end at this World Cup. It may define the next decade of soccer.
Sentiment
NeutralNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
10
Articles
9
Reach
10
A
AnonymousAuthor
