USDA Funds Protected
Judge Blocks USDA Attempt to Link Vital Funds to New Policies, Protecting Families
Anonymous
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from linking billions in USDA funds to compliance with new political conditions on June 5, 2026. U.S. District Judge Myong Joun granted a preliminary injunction, halting the rules while a lawsuit plays out in court, according to Associated Press.
The ruling protects roughly $74 billion in annual federal funding for 21 Democratic-led states and Washington, D.C., according to Courthouse News Service. The states argued the new conditions put food aid for tens of millions of low-income Americans at risk.
USDA Added New Political Rules to Grant Money
On December 31, 2025, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins signed a memo creating new "General Terms and Conditions" for all USDA grants. The rules required recipients to certify they were not promoting what the administration called "gender ideology," DEI programs, or incentives for illegal immigration, according to K-12 Dive.
Rollins said the conditions would let the USDA "take swift action" when recipients broke federal law or executive orders. But critics said the rules added strings that Congress never approved. Legal observers noted the USDA skipped the standard public comment period before making the changes, according to The National Law Review.
21 States Sue, Calling the Rules Unconstitutional Coercion
On March 23, 2026, a coalition of 20 states plus D.C. filed suit in federal court in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell called the grants a "lifeline" and said the federal government was making "essential services contingent on political capitulation," according to Mass.gov.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said, "The federal government cannot hold critical funding hostage to force states to comply with vague, ideological directives." Legal experts argued the conditions violated the Spending Clause of the Constitution by failing to give states clear notice of what would trigger a funding cut, according to Nossaman LLP.
Billions in Food Aid for Families and Children at Stake
The stakes are enormous. The 21 plaintiff states stood to lose $11.6 billion in Child Nutrition Program funds alone, according to K-12 Dive. The National School Lunch Program, which feeds nearly 30 million children every school day, was directly at risk if the conditions had taken effect.
SNAP benefits for about 39 million Americans were also on the line, according to AP. Brian Dittmeier of the National Women's Law Center said the administration's approach "encourages schools to turn the other way as marginalized youth face discrimination in the lunch line."
Judge Rules for States, but Legal Fight Is Far From Over
Judge Joun issued the injunction on June 5 but said he would release a fuller written explanation later, according to Reuters. The injunction stops the USDA from withholding funds over the 2026 conditions while the case continues. The federal government is expected to appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
The DOJ called the states' lawsuit "frivolous" and said the administration "prioritizes merit over DEI." The case is part of a wider wave of legal battles over the Trump administration's use of federal funding as leverage to enforce executive policy priorities across multiple agencies.
Sentiment
NeutralNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
11
Articles
11
Reach
11
A
AnonymousAuthor
