SkyCity agrees A$21 million fine, overhauls Adelaide casino governance to retain license

The Brian Martin review said SkyCity would have been deemed unsuitable to hold the Adelaide casino licence as recently as October 2021, although it concluded the company had since done enough to retain it.
The South Australian penalty adds to prior enforcement: after a $67 million Federal Court penalty in June 2024 tied to AUSTRAC breaches at Adelaide Casino, the company’s Adelaide total regulatory penalties rise to $88 million.
SkyCity said the A$21 million fine will be paid in three $7 million instalments, with the first A$7 million due within 28 days of the binding tripartite deed.
Beyond the headline governance and cash-cap measures, the required 1 January 2028 changes include restricting delegation of key functions to the parent without approval, and appointing an independent compliance auditor after completion of SkyCity’s “B3 compliance transformation” program.
Market reaction to the NZX announcement was muted-to-negative: after the settlement was disclosed, SkyCity shares were down at NZ$0.41, according to one report.
SkyCity Entertainment Group has agreed to pay a A$21 million fine to South Australia's gambling regulator, settling a long-running probe into governance failures and anti-money-laundering breaches at its Adelaide Casino, according to Adelaide Now. The penalty will be paid in three equal A$7 million instalments, with the first due within 28 days of a binding agreement being signed.
The deal brings SkyCity's total Adelaide regulatory penalties to A$88 million, after a separate A$67 million Federal Court fine for AUSTRAC breaches in June 2024, Business News Australia reported. CEO Jason Walbridge called the settlement a "critical milestone in restoring trust."
The settlement resolves a review led by Brian Martin AO KC, appointed in July 2022 to assess whether SkyCity was fit to hold its Adelaide casino licence. Martin found that as recently as October 2021, SkyCity would have been deemed "unsuitable" to keep the licence, TipRanks reported. The key failures included inadequate anti-money-laundering staffing and a lack of local board independence.
Drug traffickers and firearms offenders had operated at the casino during the period under review, Adelaide Now reported. Martin's final conclusion, however, was that SkyCity had done enough since then to retain the licence — but only under strict new conditions.
The settlement forces a major governance overhaul. SkyCity Adelaide must install a majority-independent local board and appoint a locally accountable CEO. The Commissioner for Liquor and Gambling will gain new powers to issue binding operational directions without needing a court order, according to Stocks Down Under.
All key changes must be in place by 1 January 2028. SkyCity will also be banned from delegating key functions back to its Auckland parent without approval. An independent compliance auditor must be appointed once SkyCity completes its internal "B3 compliance transformation" program, TipRanks noted.
Beyond governance, the deal imposes tight operational limits. Cash transactions above A$4,999 will be restricted, targeting the anonymous high-roller activity that regulators say enabled money laundering. All junket activity — organised tours that bring international high-stakes gamblers to the casino — must also be phased out entirely, Business News Australia reported.
Analysts at Jarden warned these restrictions lower Adelaide Casino's revenue ceiling permanently. "The regulatory uncertainty is reduced, but the earnings ceiling has also been lowered," a Jarden analyst said, according to Stocks Down Under. The changes effectively shift Adelaide from a high-roller destination to a domestic-focused casino.
Investors gave the announcement a cool reception. SkyCity shares fell to NZ$0.41 on the NZX after the deal was disclosed, Adelaide Now reported. Some analysts had feared a worst-case fine above A$50 million, so the A$21 million figure came in lower than expected — but the strict operational conditions offset any relief.
The Australian Financial Review framed the settlement as a "clearing of the decks" that removes the threat of total licence cancellation, according to AFR. But gambling reform advocates called the fine a "slap on the wrist," arguing the A$4,999 cash cap is still high enough to allow criminals to break large sums into smaller deposits to avoid detection. The deal remains non-binding until a separate tripartite deed is finalised.
Publishers
22
Articles
11
Reach
33