Trump's Oil Holdings Rose Up To $4.4 Million During Iran War

On March 23, after Trump said he would delay airstrikes on Iranian energy facilities and global oil prices fell by more than 10%, his accounts made 16 separate purchases of oil and gas shares valued at an estimated $163,000 to $570,000.
Trump’s investment accounts began buying energy stocks just two days after the war began, including shares of Exxon Mobil.
Trump publicly criticized Exxon Mobil and Chevron even as he held stakes in both companies, saying after their strong second-quarter results that they were making too much money and should return some of it to the public.
Democratic staff members of Congress’s Joint Economic Committee separately estimated that the value of Trump’s broader oil and gas portfolio had risen to $15.5 million since the beginning of the year.
The analysis ranked the nine holdings by aggregating Trump’s year-end 2025 positions across his investment accounts and using their disclosed values, alongside quarterly corporate reports and FactSet market data.
President Trump's nine largest oil and gas holdings surged by $1.5 million to $4.4 million between late February and August 31, during the first six months of the Iran war, according to CNBC analysis. The gains included stakes in Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, Kinder Morgan, Marathon Petroleum, Occidental Petroleum, Phillips 66, Valero Energy, and Williams Companies. The White House says independent managers control the accounts, but ethics experts warn that outsourcing management does not eliminate potential conflicts when presidential decisions can directly affect holdings value.
The analysis does not establish that Trump or his managers traded on advance knowledge or that his financial interests influenced policy. Reported gains reflect estimated changes in asset values rather than confirmed profits. However, the pattern of trading activity — including 23 trades across these nine companies and purchases timed to major policy announcements — has drawn scrutiny from ethics experts and Democratic lawmakers.
Trump's investment accounts began buying energy stocks just two days after the Iran war started. The accounts have made at least 23 separate trades involving the nine oil and gas companies. Democratic staff from Congress's Joint Economic Committee separately estimated that Trump's broader oil and gas portfolio rose to $15.5 million since the beginning of the year.
CNBC's analysis ranked the nine holdings by aggregating Trump's year-end 2025 positions across his investment accounts. Researchers used disclosed values, quarterly corporate reports, and FactSet market data to calculate the estimated gains. The timing and scale of these gains coincided with major geopolitical events that affected energy markets.
On March 23, Trump announced he would delay airstrikes on Iranian energy facilities. Global oil prices fell more than 10% in response. That same day, his accounts made 16 separate purchases of oil and gas shares valued at an estimated $163,000 to $570,000. The purchases came directly after the market moved based on his public statement.
This trading pattern raises questions about timing and decision-making. Ethics experts note that the accounts are supposed to be managed independently. However, they argue that the proximity between policy announcements and trading activity warrants scrutiny, even without evidence of improper influence.
Trump publicly criticized Exxon Mobil and Chevron even as he held significant stakes in both companies. After their strong second-quarter results, he said the companies were making too much money. He suggested they should return some profits to the public. This criticism came while he benefited directly from their stock price gains.
The apparent contradiction highlights the complexity of presidential financial interests. Trump's statements can move energy markets and affect the companies in which he holds shares. The White House maintains that independent managers make all investment decisions without Trump's involvement or knowledge.
Trump's accounts sold Exxon Mobil shares shortly before a ceasefire announcement that followed with a market decline. The timing suggests favorable exit points around major news events. However, CNBC's analysis explicitly notes that the timing does not establish advance knowledge or improper trading.
Ethics experts say the pattern warrants attention. They note that even without direct involvement, a president's financial interests can create perception problems. Independent management, they argue, does not fully eliminate conflicts when presidential policies directly affect asset values in real time.
Publishers
13
Articles
17
Reach
30