Perpetual Rejects EQT’s $22.50 Bid, Ends Talks

The A$22.50-per-share consideration matched the price in EQT’s earlier proposal dated 27 July 2026, rather than representing an increase in the headline offer price.
Perpetual had granted EQT limited, nonexclusive access to nonpublic company information after the July proposal, allowing the private-equity firm to formulate an improved bid.
EQT’s initial approach was valued at A$22.07 per share before being increased to A$22.50 later in July.
Under the proposal’s dividend terms, shareholders on the register at the relevant times would have been entitled to receive both the A$22.50 scheme consideration and any permitted dividend of up to A$0.60 per share.
The bid followed a period in which Perpetual reportedly lost a US$4.6 billion mandate, while trading multiples for global peers of the ASX-listed company had declined by about 20%.
Perpetual Limited rejected EQT's A$22.50 per share takeover bid on MarketScreener, ending months of negotiation with the Swedish private-equity firm. The board said the offer undervalues the Australian asset manager and carries unacceptable execution risk. EQT called the bid final, prompting Perpetual to halt talks and tell shareholders no action is needed MarketScreener.
The A$22.50 price matched EQT's July proposal — no headline increase despite access to Perpetual's confidential data. Shareholders would have also received up to A$0.60 per share in dividends. Perpetual shares fell 13.98% to A$16.86 on the news Tech2, wiping out the takeover premium and signaling investor disappointment.
Perpetual's board rejected the A$22.50 bid because it believed the offer undervalued the company and rested on risky assumptions about future performance MarketScreener. EQT had been granted access to Perpetual's private financial data in August to build a stronger proposal. Instead, the final bid stuck to the July price of A$22.50 per share — the same level EQT had already proposed.
The private-equity firm made the offer final and binding only if no competing bids emerged. Since Perpetual saw no path forward and no other bidders had stepped in, the board decided to end discussions. The company told shareholders that the rejection does not change its existing strategy or timeline for selling its Wealth Management unit.
Perpetual shares plunged 13.98% to A$16.86 immediately after the board rejected EQT's bid Tech2. The stock had been trading above the offer price, betting that the deal would close or that EQT would raise its bid. With talks now dead and EQT refusing to budge, that premium vanished in a single trading session.
The rejection came at a difficult time for Perpetual. The company had lost a US$4.6 billion asset management mandate, and global peer valuations had fallen roughly 20%. A lower stock price makes Perpetual a harder sell to shareholders and limits options if management wants to pursue a different buyer down the line.
Perpetual plans to press ahead with its existing strategy: selling the Wealth Management business by the end of 2026. Once that sale closes, the company expects to shift to a net cash position and concentrate solely on Corporate Trust and Asset Management MarketScreener. The board made clear that EQT's rejection does not alter this roadmap.
Without a takeover, Perpetual will operate as a standalone, smaller firm. Management must now convince investors that the remaining business is worth owning — a tougher pitch after losing major clients and watching the stock fall 14% in one day. The company has no announced plans to seek other bidders or explore alternative strategies at this stage.
Publishers
20
Articles
53
Reach
73