Parliament Questions HMRC On City Taxes
UK MPs question tax authorities regarding financial findings from the Manchester City commission.
Anonymous
Key Points
1
The commission found Manchester City liable for 114 of the 115 charges brought against it, covering the 2009-10 to 2017-18 seasons; the charges remain subject to the club’s appeal.
2
HMRC has powers to reject contrived transactions that reduce taxable income and impose penalties for tax underpayments arising from false statements. One report noted, however, that the alleged revenue inflation would have increased the club’s profitability—and potentially its tax bill.
3
Tax Policy Associates said the commission’s findings and leaked documents pointed to a possible £12 million in unpaid UK tax linked to Roberto Mancini’s payments being routed through a sham consultancy. The group said it did not know whether HMRC had opened an investigation and saw no settlement payments in the club’s accounts.
4
The commission also found that Manchester City used devices to disguise the true extent of certain club liabilities.
UK lawmakers are pressing tax authorities to investigate whether Manchester City dodged taxes following a Premier League commission's ruling that the club broke financial rules over nine seasons. Treasury Committee chair Meg Hillier asked HMRC chief JP Marks whether the tax office has reviewed the commission's findings and what it plans to do about potential tax violations Civil Service World. The commission found Manchester City liable for 114 of 115 charges, alleging the club inflated revenue and understated costs by more than £900 million through sham commercial contracts.
Manchester City denies wrongdoing and is appealing the decision. While the Premier League's findings focus on league rules, they raise separate tax questions. Tax Policy Associates identified a possible £12 million in unpaid UK tax linked to payments routed through a sham consultancy, though it's unclear if HMRC has opened a formal investigation Professional Adviser.
Commission Found Massive Financial Rule Breaches
The Premier League's independent commission spent years investigating Manchester City's finances from 2009-10 to 2017-18. It concluded the club breached league rules 114 times out of 115 charges LBC. The findings revealed sham commercial deals with sponsors designed to disguise the true extent of club liabilities and inflate reported revenue. The commission alleged this scheme hid over £900 million in actual financial activity from league oversight.
Tax Office May Have Authority to Act on False Statements
HMRC has legal powers to reject contrived transactions that artificially reduce taxable income and to impose penalties for tax underpayments stemming from false statements. However, tax experts note a complication: inflating revenue—what Manchester City is accused of—would actually increase reported profitability and potentially raise the club's tax bill, not lower it Professional Adviser. This distinction matters for whether tax law violations occurred alongside the league rule breaches.
Experts Point to Unpaid Tax on Sham Consultancy Payments
Tax Policy Associates flagged one specific tax concern: roughly £12 million in unpaid UK tax potentially linked to payments for coach Roberto Mancini routed through a sham consultancy structure. The group reviewed the commission's findings and leaked internal documents but found no evidence of settlement payments in Manchester City's published accounts Professional Adviser. It remains unknown whether HMRC has launched an investigation or if the tax office already has the full unredacted commission report.
Parliament Demands Transparency on Broader Club Tax Patterns
Hillier's questions to HMRC go beyond Manchester City alone. She asked whether the tax authority has identified wider tax issues across football clubs, particularly around how players and coaches are paid and compensated UK Parliament News. This signals growing concern that sham structures and hidden payments may be systemic problems in professional football, not isolated to one club. HMRC has not yet publicly disclosed its response.
Sentiment
Mostly NegativeNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
16
Articles
21
Reach
37
A
AnonymousAuthor
