Melbourne businessman found guilty of rape and sexual assault in high-profile trial.

The trial lasted roughly two to three weeks, with juries reported as comprising nine women and three men, reflecting a lengthy, high-profile proceedings.
Suppression orders extended to masking the defendant’s name, age and industry, with bans on publishing a pixelated photo and ongoing hearings about whether to lift the gag.
A central feature of the case was the credibility of the complainant, supported by testimony from the alleged victim and a former personal assistant who gave evidence for multiple days in a closed court.
The complainant was a 27-year-old personal assistant, whom the defence said the man had recruited for work (including on his autobiography) after meeting through work; testimony noted she was brought to his home by Uber for discussions prior to the alleged offences.
The defence argued the complainant had a financial motive to lie, framing the allegations as fabrications or inflated claims, a point repeatedly contrasted with the prosecution’s efforts to establish credibility.
A Melbourne businessman has been found guilty of raping and sexually assaulting a woman at his home on March 23, 2023, according to ABC News and AFR. A Victorian County Court jury found him guilty on two counts of rape and one count of sexual assault after roughly two weeks of trial.
The man cannot be named. Suppression orders block his identity, age, and industry from being published, according to PerthNow. A formal hearing to decide whether to lift those orders is expected.
The complainant was a 27-year-old personal assistant, according to Southern Highland News. The man had recruited her for work, including on his autobiography, after the two met through professional channels. On the night in question, she was brought to his home by Uber. Prosecutors said a night of drinking and cocaine use preceded the alleged offences.
Prosecutors argued the alcohol and cocaine left the complainant vulnerable. The jury found beyond reasonable doubt that the man raped and sexually assaulted her, according to ABC News. The assaults took place at his home in March 2023.
The man maintained his innocence throughout the trial, according to Southern Highland News. His defence argued the complainant had a financial motive to lie. They framed the allegations as fabrications or inflated claims designed to benefit her financially.
Prosecutors pushed back hard. There were no eyewitnesses, so the trial came down to credibility. A former personal assistant gave evidence over multiple days in a closed court, supporting the complainant's account, according to Head Topics. The jury of nine women and three men ultimately sided with the prosecution.
Courts in Victoria can block the public naming of accused persons in rape trials. In this case, the suppression order covers the man's name, age, and the industry he works in. Even a pixelated photo of him cannot be published, according to PerthNow.
A hearing to decide whether to lift the gag order is planned, according to AFR. Until then, the man remains unnamed. The case has drawn significant attention in Melbourne's legal and social circles, given his described status as well-connected and high-profile.
The man has not yet been sentenced. No date has been reported publicly. The next major step is the naming hearing, where a court will decide if his identity can be revealed to the public, according to ABC News.
The case has reignited debate about anonymity rules in sex offence trials. Critics question whether suppression orders protect the accused too broadly. Supporters say they are essential to protect the integrity of trials and shield complainants from further harm.
Publishers
13
Articles
33
Reach
46