Reaves Contract Warning
NBA Salary Cap Expert Warns Teams Against Max Contract for Lakers' Austin Reaves
Anonymous
Austin Reaves is set to walk away from a $14.9 million player option and hit the open market as an unrestricted free agent on June 30, and the bidding could reach as high as $239 million over five years. But ESPN's top salary cap expert is pumping the brakes. Lindy's Sports reports that Bobby Marks, a former NBA front office executive, issued a blunt warning to any team ready to hand Reaves a max deal: "Teams shouldn't get cute."
Marks went further, saying, "I personally do not believe he is a max player." With a weak 2026 free agent class inflating the value of available stars, Reaves stands at the center of what could become one of the summer's most consequential — and risky — signings.
Reaves Bets on Himself After Rejecting Extension
Reaves turned down a four-year, $89.2 million extension offer from the Lakers back in October 2025, choosing instead to test free agency. That gamble appears to be paying off. He finished the 2025-26 season with career-best numbers: 23.3 points, 5.5 assists, and 4.7 rebounds per game while shooting 49% from the field, according to Athlon Sports.
At 28 years old, Reaves is seeking what sources describe as "generational wealth." The LA Times' Broderick Turner reports he wants the full five-year, $239.3 million max. The Lakers hold an edge — their Bird Rights allow them to offer a fifth year that rival teams cannot. The Athletic reported on June 12 that the Brooklyn Nets are already preparing a four-year, $178.5 million offer sheet the moment free agency opens.
Bobby Marks Warns: Max Money for a Third Option Is Too Risky
Marks made his case plainly on the "Hoops Talk" podcast. "For me to do a five-year, $239 [million] contract, that's a big number, man," he said. His core argument: Reaves is an excellent player, but he functions as a third scoring option behind Luka Doncic. Paying a third option roughly $48 million per year — the same tier as Doncic — limits a team's ability to build around him.
The math gets worse under the NBA's new "Second Apron" rules. If the Lakers pay Reaves the full max, their total payroll could push past $222.3 million. That triggers hard penalties: no Mid-Level Exception, no trading future first-round picks, and no taking back more salary than they send out in trades, according to Hoops Rumors.
Lakers Face a Painful Choice: Pay Up or Risk Losing Him
Lakers VP Rob Pelinka has said publicly, "Both sides have made it abundantly clear that we want to work something out where he continues his prolific career here." But wanting it and paying for it are two different things. Bleacher Report's Eric Pincus suggests the Lakers may try a middle path — a five-year deal starting at around $35 million annually, totaling roughly $203 million — to stay below the Second Apron.
Marks warned that low-balling Reaves is just as dangerous. If the Lakers "get cute" and offer too little, Brooklyn's $178.5 million offer could pull Reaves out of Los Angeles. That would leave the Lakers with a gaping hole in their backcourt alongside Doncic and LeBron James, in what is already considered a dry free agent market, per Lake Show Life.
A Weak Free Agent Market Is Driving Up Reaves' Price Tag
Part of what makes this situation so complicated is the market itself. Most top NBA stars are already locked into extensions, leaving Reaves as one of the few elite names available. That scarcity is driving his price well above what his numbers might otherwise command. Lindy's Sports notes that Marks flagged both Reaves and Doncic as players who are "likely to be overpaid by someone" this offseason.
The 2026-27 salary cap has been set at $165.4 million — a record, but about $1 million below earlier projections due to falling local TV revenue, per Hoops Rumors. Anonymous Eastern Conference scouts told The Athletic they believe Reaves is "leveraging the Lakers' desperation" and question whether he could carry a team as a true No. 1 option in Brooklyn or Detroit. The next two weeks will answer that question.
Sentiment
NeutralNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
7
Articles
6
Reach
7
Topics
A
AnonymousAuthor
