Estonian Defence Minister Resigns Following Scrutiny Over Flawed €70M Ammunition Deal

Datasel SRL, the supplier tied to the €70m deal, is described as an Indian-owned, Italian-based shell company with no prior history of selling artillery shells.
Even when some munitions arrived, investigators found the rounds to be faulty and incomplete, with some shipments not being sent to Ukraine due to defects (e.g., missing fuze/propellant).
The funding for the deal came from the EU's European Peace Facility, with Estonia making a large upfront payment; the instrument itself was established prior to Russia's invasion.
Estonia's National Audit Office criticized defence spending and the Centre for Defence Investments, raising governance and accounting concerns across the defence sector.
Opposition parties signaled plans for a no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Kristen Michal over the scandal, highlighting political tensions ahead of elections.
Estonia's defence minister Hanno Pevkur has resigned over a €70 million EU-funded ammunition deal for Ukraine that went catastrophically wrong. Yahoo News reported that the contract was awarded to Datasel SRL, a company with zero prior experience selling artillery shells, and some munitions arrived faulty or incomplete.
Prosecutors and Estonia's National Audit Office launched investigations into the defence ministry's procurement practices. Breaking Defense noted that the scandal has intensified political pressure on Prime Minister Kristen Michal's minority government ahead of elections, with opposition parties signaling no-confidence votes.
Datasel SRL, described as an Indian-owned, Italian-based firm, won the €70 million contract despite having never sold a single artillery round. Telegraph reported that Estonia made large upfront payments from the EU's European Peace Facility, a fund created before Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
When shells finally arrived, investigators found them defective and incomplete. Yahoo News noted that some shipments lacked fuzes or propellant, making them unusable. Estonia refused to send these faulty rounds to Ukraine and is now pursuing the matter through arbitration in Strasbourg.
Pevkur emphasized that as defence minister, he must accept political responsibility for his ministry—even though he did not personally negotiate the contracts. AllSides reported that opposition parties are preparing no-confidence votes against Prime Minister Michal, threatening to destabilize his already fragile majority.
The scandal has widened scrutiny of Estonia's entire defence sector. The National Audit Office criticized governance and accounting practices at the Centre for Defence Investments, raising systemic questions about how defence spending is managed and overseen.
Despite the procurement disaster, Estonia remains committed to arming Ukraine against Russia's invasion. Breaking Defense noted the government is pursuing legal and international channels to recover funds or resolve disputes over the failed contracts.
The case exposes the risks of rapid, large-scale defence spending in wartime. Estonia's experience suggests that even well-intentioned EU funding mechanisms can become targets for fraud when procurement safeguards are weak or bypassed under pressure to deliver aid quickly.
Publishers
16
Articles
23
Reach
39