Minnesota's 'MyGender Dolls' for young children, developed by the University, draw controversy over taxpayer funding.

The MyGender Dolls project originated as a University of Minnesota Medical School research program in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, led by Dianne Berg, PhD, and G. Nic Rider, with input from Institute for Sexual and Gender Health psychologist Rachel Becker-Warner. Berg described the aim as addressing beliefs about body parts and helping children cope with stigma by presenting options they can be — regardless of anatomy.
Prototype examples shown at a 2024 conference included a doll named 'Sam' with detachable genitals and a dress, illustrating the dolls’ design as a 'trans Mr. Potato Head' style educational tool.
The dolls are marketed and planned for distribution to professionals in educational and clinical settings—teachers, school counselors, pediatricians and mental health providers—raising questions about parental opt-out and the scope of classroom use.
Public funding details indicate the University of Minnesota Medical School has been receiving about $15 million annually from the state, via Gov. Walz, to ‘increase the medical school’s research capacity’ and raise its national prominence, which underpins the MyGender Dolls project.
Conservative commentary has challenged the project, with Dr. Quentin Van Meter, former president of the American College of Pediatricians, asserting the dolls “have no place in an ethical medical care world.”
Minnesota schools could see gender-themed dolls with detachable genitalia in classrooms as early as this fall, targeting children as young as 4. The project, called MyGender Dolls, was developed at the University of Minnesota Medical School and is backed by state funding tied to Gov. Tim Walz, according to Fox News.
The dolls feature more than 100 clothing options, gender-neutral names, and swappable body parts. Developers say they are a tool for teachers, school counselors, and pediatricians to help gender-diverse children. Critics call the program inappropriate and a waste of taxpayer money.
The MyGender Dolls project started as a research program inside the University of Minnesota's Department of Family Medicine and Community Health. Lead researcher Dianne Berg, PhD, said the goal is to address children's beliefs about body parts and help them cope with stigma. Berg framed the dolls as showing kids "different options for who they can be — regardless of anatomy," according to The Post Millennial.
At a 2024 conference, researchers showed a prototype doll named "Sam" wearing a dress and featuring detachable genitals. Observers compared the design to a "trans Mr. Potato Head." The dolls are now being packaged for distribution to professionals in schools and clinical settings, The Post Millennial reported.
The University of Minnesota Medical School receives about $15 million per year in state funding, channeled through Gov. Walz, to boost research capacity and raise the school's national profile. That funding stream underpins projects like MyGender Dolls, according to Fox News. Walz, the 2024 Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has backed broader gender health initiatives throughout his time as governor.
The dolls are tied to the university's Eli Coleman Institute, a center focused on sexual and gender health. Institute psychologist Rachel Becker-Warner also contributed to the project's development. The research team has pursued additional grant funding on top of the state money, The Post Millennial reported.
The dolls are planned for use by teachers, school counselors, pediatricians, and mental health providers with children aged 4 to 10. The rollout raises direct questions about whether parents can opt their children out. Neither the university nor state officials have publicly detailed any parental notification or opt-out process, according to Lucianne.com.
The planned classroom debut is set for fall 2025. Supporters say the tool helps professionals start conversations with gender-diverse children in a safe way. But the lack of clear parental controls has become a central point of criticism from parents and advocacy groups watching the program.
Dr. Quentin Van Meter, former president of the American College of Pediatricians, offered sharp criticism of the program. He said the dolls "have no place in an ethical medical care world." Van Meter argued that exposing children as young as 4 to gender transition concepts through play crosses a professional and moral boundary, according to Fox News.
The debate over MyGender Dolls mirrors a wider national fight over public money for gender health programs and the role of schools in transgender issues. Conservative outlets have framed the project as a misuse of taxpayer funds. Supporters counter that the dolls address real mental health needs for a vulnerable group of children, Head Topics reported.
Publishers
15
Articles
7
Reach
22