GST Council to consider removing tax authorities arrest powers to address business overreach concerns.

Central GST formations recorded 887 arrests among 72,393 GST-offence cases from 2021–22 through 2024–25; state authorities made additional arrests. Under Section 69 of the CGST Act, arrest requires the Commissioner’s approval and applies where there are reasons to believe a person committed offences such as using fake invoices or fraudulently claiming input tax credit.
Industry experts said arrest powers were used as a harassment tool, particularly in services such as banking and insurance, and could be deployed even when there was no risk of the accused fleeing or evidence being destroyed.
The articles describe common GST-fraud methods that the proposed change would not itself eliminate: fake identities or mule accounts used to claim input tax credit, invoices for goods never supplied, and understated final-goods values or manipulated raw-material purchases.
A separate Enforcement Directorate investigation illustrates the scale of some alleged frauds: the agency said a group had generated and passed on more than ₹734 crore in fake input tax credit, which was then sold on commission to firms seeking to evade GST liabilities.
India's GST Council will meet on October 7 to consider removing tax officials' arrest powers, a major shift in enforcement after business groups complained the authority was being misused. Deccan Herald reports the move would require arrests for tax crimes to go through courts instead, while deliberate fraud would still be prosecuted under criminal law.
The proposal follows months of talks between the Centre and states. Economic Times notes the Council may also set a ₹5 crore threshold before prosecution begins. Central authorities made 887 arrests across 72,393 GST cases from 2021–22 through 2024–25, but industry groups say arrest powers were used to harass businesses rather than stop real fraud.
Tax officials have wielded arrest authority as a harassment tool, particularly in banking and insurance, according to industry experts cited by ETV Bharat. The arrests happen under Section 69 of the CGST Act, which lets the Commissioner approve arrests when officials suspect tax crimes like fake invoices or fraudulent input tax credit claims.
The problem: arrest powers were deployed even when there was no risk the accused would flee or destroy evidence. Economic Times reports officials could arrest people in minor cases, turning a tax dispute into a criminal matter without court review beforehand.
Removing arrest powers won't eliminate the fraud schemes tax officials actually encounter. Deccan Herald describes common tactics: criminals use fake identities or "mule" accounts to claim fake input tax credits, submit invoices for goods never supplied, or understate final-goods values and manipulate raw-material purchases to hide taxable income.
A single Enforcement Directorate case shows the scale: Economic Times reports a group generated and passed on more than ₹734 crore in fake input tax credits, which were then sold on commission to firms trying to evade GST. This illustrates why reform must balance protecting businesses from harassment with stopping organized tax evasion.
Deliberate fraud and deceit won't get a free pass. Economic Times reports serious cases—likely those above the ₹5 crore threshold—would be prosecuted as criminal offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, India's criminal code. These cases would require court approval before arrest, adding a check on official overreach.
The shift aims to rebuild investor confidence without gutting enforcement. By moving arrest decisions to courts, the government hopes to stop tax officials from using arrest as a negotiation tactic while still pursuing organized fraud through the criminal justice system.
Publishers
44
Articles
56
Reach
100