IOC Declines Ethics Probe Into FIFA President Infantino Amid Trump, Balogun Controversies

Infantino attended Donald Trump’s so-called 'Board of Peace' meeting in February and wore a red cap reading 'USA' and '45-47'; this episode had previously been dismissed by the IOC as not falling under its ethics rules.
FIFA awarded Donald Trump its inaugural peace prize in December, an accolade tied to Trump’s actions to promote peace and unity, which Infantino has publicly cited in context of the relationship.
The Norwegian Football Federation indicated it was weighing a formal complaint to FIFA’s ethics committee over Balogun’s suspension decision, signaling ongoing scrutiny of Balogun’s disciplinary handling.
Balogun’s one-match ban was suspended for 12 months, allowing him to participate in the last-16 match after the suspension was deferred, a development noted amid the broader controversy over the decision.
The International Olympic Committee will not investigate FIFA president Gianni Infantino over his close ties to Donald Trump or his role in overturning a red-card ban at the World Cup, according to Reuters. The IOC rejected a formal complaint from human rights group FairSquare, ruling the issues fall outside the IOC Ethics Commission's jurisdiction.
The decision draws a sharp line around what the IOC will — and will not — police. Governance decisions made by FIFA, and FIFA's relations with governments, are off-limits for the IOC, the committee said, according to CTV News.
Human rights group FairSquare filed the complaint against Infantino over two linked controversies. The first was his public support for Trump. The second was his role in suspending a one-match World Cup ban for a player's red-card offense, allowing that player to compete in a last-16 match, according to CP24.
The IOC ruled it has no power over either issue. The committee said Infantino has been an IOC member since 2020, but FIFA operates as an independent international federation. Under the Olympic Charter, such bodies are shielded from outside interference — including from the IOC itself — on governance matters, GB News reported.
The controversy started in February, when Infantino attended Trump's so-called 'Board of Peace' meeting and wore a red cap reading 'USA' and '45-47.' Critics said that broke Olympic rules on political neutrality. The IOC had already dismissed that episode before FairSquare's formal complaint arrived.
FIFA also awarded Trump its first-ever peace prize in December, tied to Trump's stated efforts to promote peace and unity. Infantino publicly cited that prize in defending the FIFA-Trump relationship, according to Reuters. The IOC said even those actions fall under FIFA governance, not its own ethics code.
At the center of the red-card dispute is a player whose one-match ban was suspended for 12 months. That move let him play in a knockout-round match rather than sit it out. Critics, including football officials in Norway, called the decision a troubling use of FIFA's disciplinary powers, according to AJC.
The Norwegian Football Federation said it was weighing a formal complaint — but to FIFA's own ethics committee, not the IOC. That path may prove just as difficult. FIFA's ethics body answers to FIFA, and Infantino leads FIFA. The route to accountability remains unclear.
The decision makes one thing plain: the IOC Ethics Commission is not a catch-all watchdog for the Olympic Movement. It covers IOC members' personal conduct under the IOC Code of Ethics — not how international federations run themselves or deal with governments, GB News reported.
For governance reformers, that gap is the problem. Infantino sits inside the IOC as a member, yet his actions as FIFA chief sit outside its reach. The ruling does not end scrutiny of Infantino — it just confirms the IOC will not be the one applying it, according to CTV News.
Publishers
26
Articles
170
Reach
196