Graham Questions Iran Deal
Senator Lindsey Graham Expresses Doubts on US-Iran Deal, Urges VP Vance to Inform Congress
Anonymous
Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the loudest Republican hawks during the 107-day U.S.-Iran war, is casting doubt on the deal that ended it. "I am somewhat concerned that Iran's view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming," Graham wrote on X. "Time will tell." The Times of Israel reported his comments on June 15, 2026, the same day G7 leaders confirmed the so-called "Islamabad Memorandum" at their summit in France.
The deal, announced by President Trump on June 14 via Truth Social, reopens the Strait of Hormuz — the critical waterway that carries roughly one-fifth of the world's oil supply. Brent crude fell 3% to $84 per barrel within hours of the announcement, according to Reuters. A formal signing ceremony is scheduled for June 19 in Geneva.
Graham Demands Congress Be Briefed on Deal Terms
Graham has called on Vice President JD Vance to brief Congress on the agreement's details. His core fear: the U.S. and Iran are reading the same document very differently. Vance pushed back, telling media that "no funds were released in exchange for signing" and that the full text would reach Congress this week, according to ABC News.
The agreement is technically a Memorandum of Understanding, not a formal treaty. Axios reported it extends the current ceasefire for 60 days to allow final nuclear talks. If no progress is made within that window, the U.S. has threatened to resume its naval blockade of Iran.
The Strait Dispute at the Heart of the Deal
Trump declared the Strait of Hormuz "permanently toll-free" and posted "Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!" on Truth Social, according to The New York Times. But Tehran tells a different story. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the deal gives Iran the right to charge "service fees" on shipping passing through the Strait.
That gap could cause immediate friction at sea. The Strait was blocked by Iran on March 2, just two days after the war began, sending Brent crude to a peak of $110 per barrel. Iran also claims the deal releases $24 billion in frozen assets — half immediately. The U.S. insists any release will be "performance-based," according to Reuters.
Israel Says It Is Not Bound by the Agreement
Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz have both stated that Israel is not bound by the deal. Katz declared that Israeli forces will remain in a "buffer zone" in southern Lebanon indefinitely, according to The Guardian. That is a problem. The deal, as confirmed by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, requires a "permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon."
Analyst Steven Cook of the Council on Foreign Relations warned: "We have been here before only to discover the parties cannot bridge the remaining gaps." The war killed an estimated 7,468 to 10,018 people across all fronts. Lebanon suffered the highest toll, with over 3,700 dead. U.S. losses stand at 15 killed and 543 wounded, according to PBS.
A $178 Billion War That Shaped the Midterm Calculus
The conflict cost the U.S. an estimated $178 billion — roughly $21,759 every second it lasted, according to Vision of Humanity. The global economy faces a potential $2.2 trillion hit if fighting resumes. G7 leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, welcomed the deal as the only viable way to stop a global economic slide, though they remain cautious ahead of the June 19 signing deadline.
For Trump, the deal also serves a domestic purpose. With November 2026 midterm elections approaching, lower gas prices matter. The Strait closure helped drive prices at the pump sharply higher for American consumers. Whether the agreement holds — and whether Graham's doubts prove correct — may shape the political landscape for months to come.
Sentiment
NeutralNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
21
Articles
20
Reach
21
Topics
A
AnonymousAuthor
