Supreme Court Petition Seeks Interim Suspension Of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar

A petition filed in India’s Supreme Court asks for Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s interim suspension and challenges his alleged unilateral exercise of powers vested in the Election Commission collectively. The petitioner cites reports of roughly 14 disputed decisions over which Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi reportedly recorded objections, and relies on constitutional and statutory provisions that call for unanimous decisions where possible and majority decisions when commissioners disagree. The allegations have not been adjudicated; the petition seeks the poll panel’s original records and a court ruling on the commission’s decision-making authority. Separately, Nigeria’s Federal High Court ruled that enforcement of a three-year disciplinary suspension imposed on senior lawyer J-K Gadzama was unconstitutional, citing the absence of an effective appeal mechanism and finding the disciplinary committee lacked jurisdiction; it barred enforcement and related publication of the decision.
One disputed action cited in the petition was a reported July 2026 change to Form 6, requiring applicants to state whether they, their parents or grandparents appeared on the electoral roll used in the last Special Intensive Revision.
Beyond seeking the CEC’s interim suspension, the petitioner asked the Supreme Court to appoint an independent Judicial Inquiry Commission or SIT led by a retired Supreme Court judge.
The PIL asks the court to require that any communication, order, direction or other action in the Election Commission’s name be backed by a unanimous decision or, if commissioners disagree, a majority decision; the petition says the allegations remain unadjudicated.
The Nigerian court’s restraints were expressed as subject to the establishment of an effective appellate platform for challenging decisions by the relevant disciplinary authorities.
Publishers
22
Articles
14
Reach
36