Quiet Supersonic Flight Returns
FAA Plans to Replace Long-Standing Supersonic Overland Flight Ban with Noise-Based Rules
Anonymous
Key Points
1
Ground-impact threshold would allow 'boomless' Mach 1+ cruise over land only if surface pressure from sonic events does not exceed 0.11 pounds per square foot, effectively replacing a speed-based ban with a ground-noise standard.
2
FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford argued that advances will 'eliminate the old sonic boom' and that the policy could 'repeal the ban from the 1970s' while minimizing noise impacts to communities along routes and near airports.
3
The regulatory plan is a two-phase process: first a noise-based certification standard for Mach 1+ airliners, with a separate set of rules on takeoff and landing noise to follow, with finalization targeted by mid-2027.
4
Demonstration programs are central to the approach, including Boom Supersonic’s XB-1 (tests reportedly not audible on the ground) and NASA’s X-59 Quiet Supersonic Demonstrator (to fly at Mach 1.4 at about 55,000 feet and over U.S. communities to gauge public perception).
5
The shift traces back to the 1973 overland ban, rooted in public backlash to sonic booms and later enforced against Concorde; public reaction was a key driver behind the original prohibition.
The FAA formally proposed scrapping a 53-year-old ban on civil supersonic flight over the continental United States on June 30, 2026, replacing it with a strict noise-based standard Gizmodo. Under the new rule, aircraft can fly faster than Mach 1 over land — as long as ground-level pressure from the sonic event stays at or below 0.11 pounds per square foot Forbes.
FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said advances in aerospace engineering "will eliminate the old sonic boom" and allow the agency to "repeal the ban from the 1970s while minimizing noise impacts to residents" Gizmodo. A 45-day public comment period is now open, with final rules targeted for mid-2027 Aviation Week.
A 1973 Ban Born From Public Outrage Over Sonic Booms
The original prohibition traces back to 1964, when the FAA ran the "Bongo" tests in Oklahoma City — subjecting residents to eight sonic booms a day for six months Gizmodo. While most residents said they could tolerate the noise, over 15,000 damage claims flooded in. Public backlash killed the American supersonic transport program and forced the Anglo-French Concorde to fly only over oceans Travel and Tour World.
The FAA made the ban official in March 1973 Forbes. For over five decades, no commercial aircraft could legally break the sound barrier over U.S. soil. The Concorde flew trans-Atlantic routes but never crossed the American heartland at supersonic speed.
New "Boomless" Technology Makes the Rule Change Possible
The proposal relies on a concept called "Mach cutoff" — shaping the aircraft and adjusting flight angles so shockwaves bend upward into the atmosphere instead of hitting the ground Aviation Week. Boom Supersonic's XB-1 demonstrator broke the sound barrier in January 2025 and completed its final test flight in February 2025, with no audible boom reaching the ground Travel and Tour World.
NASA's X-59 Quiet Supersonic Demonstrator flew at Mach 1.4 at 55,000 feet on June 12, 2026, hitting its target mission conditions Gizmodo. The X-59 aims for a noise level of 75 EPNdB — roughly equivalent to a car door closing 20 feet away. NASA plans to fly the aircraft over U.S. communities later in 2026 to measure public reaction. That data will anchor the final 2027 rule.
Two-Phase Rules, a 2027 Deadline, and a Big Market at Stake
The FAA is rolling out its framework in two steps. The first rule — out now — covers noise during supersonic cruise over land Aviation Week. A second rule, expected later in 2026, will tackle takeoff and landing noise near airports. That phase is likely to be more contested, since it directly affects neighborhoods around airfields Travel and Tour World.
The global market for commercial supersonic aircraft is projected to reach $70.54 billion by 2034, according to Fortune Business Insights. If the rules take hold, companies like Boom Supersonic, Hermeus, and Spike Aerospace stand to attract billions in fresh investment. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy framed the shift as "unleashing American innovation and ushering in a Golden Age of Travel" Forbes.
Skeptics Warn of Cost, Carbon, and Political Hurdles
Not everyone is cheering. Environmental groups argue that supersonic jets burn far more fuel than subsonic planes, even on shorter trips Gizmodo. They have flagged potential legal challenges under the National Environmental Policy Act, saying the FAA has not fully studied high-altitude emissions or the effect of repeated low-level thumps on communities.
Market analysts question whether affordable supersonic travel is realistic. Boom's Overture airliner is designed to run on sustainable aviation fuel, which costs far more than standard jet fuel — potentially keeping ticket prices in a luxury-only bracket Forbes. On the political side, two U.S. senators have requested an ethics investigation into Administrator Bedford over past airline holdings, which could slow Senate action on the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act and push the 2027 deadline Head Topics.
Sentiment
Mostly NegativeNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
15
Articles
4
Reach
19
A
AnonymousAuthor
