U.S. Plans Tariff Delay Until Trump-Xi Summit

Beijing has previously indicated that cumulative U.S. tariffs of about 20% on Chinese goods would be consistent with the conditions of a trade truce with Washington.
The administration is also considering the diplomatic risks of delaying the announcement: releasing the tariffs after the summit could create the impression that China had reneged on agreements, suggesting that internal coordination remains unsettled.
A separate March investigation examined forced-labor practices across 60 economies, including China, Japan and South Korea; in July, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced final tariffs of up to 12.5% on South Korea, Japan and 58 other trading partners over those concerns.
The summit agenda is expected to extend beyond tariffs and trade, with U.S. and Chinese officials also expected to discuss the war in Iran and artificial intelligence.
The Trump administration plans to delay announcing new tariffs on Chinese goods until after President Donald Trump meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping on September 24. NDTV Profit reports the administration had prepared a Section 301 investigation recommending an additional 7.5% tariff on China, which could push total second-term tariffs to around 20% — a level Moneycontrol notes Beijing has previously said would be acceptable for a trade truce.
The timing suggests the White House wants to avoid worsening tensions before negotiations. The Daily Jagran reports the broader investigation covers China, Japan, South Korea, and other trading partners. Separate forced-labor tariffs could add up to 12.5% in duties on additional nations after the Supreme Court rejected Trump's earlier emergency tariff approach.
Delaying the tariff announcement protects the threat as negotiating leverage. CNBC TV18 notes the decision is meant to prevent deepening U.S.-China tensions ahead of talks. But officials face a dilemma: announcing tariffs after the summit could suggest China failed to honor agreements, creating confusion about whether a deal actually succeeded.
The administration has offered no public explanation for the delay. The White House and U.S. Trade Representative have not commented on the timing or final tariff rates, leaving markets uncertain whether the 20% level will hold or change during summit discussions.
The Section 301 investigation focuses on alleged excess manufacturing capacity — a concern spanning China, Japan, South Korea, and numerous other trading partners. Moneycontrol explains the probe is separate from earlier forced-labor investigations that already produced results in July, when the U.S. Trade Representative announced final tariffs up to 12.5% on 60 nations including South Korea and Japan.
The cumulative effect could be substantial. A base layer of existing second-term tariffs, plus the potential 7.5% from the capacity investigation, plus up to 12.5% from forced-labor concerns means some trading partners could face tariffs well above 20%. The precise combination remains unclear as the administration awaits the summit outcome.
The September 24 meeting between Trump and Xi will address issues beyond tariffs. U.S. and Chinese officials are expected to discuss the war in Iran and artificial intelligence competition. These broader topics suggest the summit is intended to reset the bilateral relationship, not just haggle over tariff rates.
Beijing's willingness to accept a 20% cumulative tariff level signals both sides may be seeking a framework to contain escalation. However, the uncertainty around timing and final rates leaves room for miscalculation if either side interprets delays or announcements as negotiating weakness rather than diplomatic caution.
Publishers
15
Articles
27
Reach
42