GOP Senate Candidates Urge End to Iran War Amid Rising Fuel Costs

Ashley Hinson acknowledged in a June conversation with a voter that the Iran war could become a “political liability” unless it ended “by the next couple of weeks,” according to a recording obtained by CBS News.
Hinson has voted against every war-powers resolution offered in the House, including one that passed with support from seven House Republicans; her Democratic opponent criticized her, saying, “when you had a chance to vote to end this war, you chose not to.”
Republican Michigan gubernatorial nominee John James said Iran “cannot have a nuke,” but added that he has always supported using “every resource at our disposal to bring this war to an end quickly.”
The proposed ban on diesel exports has drawn opposition from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, who warned it could raise prices because the United States refines more imported diesel than domestic diesel and could face retaliatory export restrictions.
Criticism of Hinson’s reversal has been amplified by the congressional calendar: her opponent argued that she was merely posting about ending the war after refusing to vote for it, while commentator Tim Miller noted that Congress would remain recessed until after the election, reducing the need for her to demonstrate that position through a vote.
Struggling Republican Senate candidates are reversing course on the Iran war, calling for an immediate end to the seven-month conflict as diesel prices hit record highs. CBS News obtained a June recording where Iowa candidate Ashley Hinson warned the war could become a "political liability" unless it ended "by the next couple of weeks." Now Hinson, Michigan's Mike Rogers, and Ohio's Jon Husted are all publicly demanding the conflict stop—a dramatic shift that coincides with national diesel prices reaching $6.51 per gallon, up from $3.70 a year ago.
The candidates' turnaround exposes a painful political reality: Trump-endorsed Republicans face voter anger over skyrocketing fuel costs just as the midterm elections loom. Yet critics note the timing raises questions about authenticity. Hinson voted against every House war-powers resolution, including six recent votes to end the conflict. Her Democratic opponent noted the contradiction: "When you had a chance to vote to end this war, you chose not to."
Hinson, Rogers, and others now propose concrete steps: suspend federal gas taxes, ban diesel exports, and provide direct relief to farmers and truckers. Local12 reported that Hinson urged the House to address the diesel surge affecting rural communities. Rogers released a social media ad stating: "The war in Iran needs to end, and end quickly. When it does, energy costs will plummet." Senator Jon Husted told Politico: "The war needs to come to an end as quickly as possible so that we can lower gas prices."
President Trump continues defending his military strategy and suggests escalation remains possible. Yet he has shown openness to diesel export restrictions—creating confusion about his actual position. The contrast highlights a core problem for Trump-backed candidates: they need to show concern about inflation without directly criticizing the president's decisions. Michigan gubernatorial nominee John James captured this tension, stating Iran "cannot have a nuke" but also saying he supports using "every resource at our disposal to bring this war to an end quickly."
Hinson's reversal faces scrutiny because of her legislative voting record. She voted against war-powers resolutions six times in recent months, despite seven House Republicans supporting one measure. Political commentator Tim Miller noted a convenient fact: Congress remains recessed until after the election. This means Hinson can call for ending the war on social media without facing an immediate vote that would force her to put her words into action. Her opponent seized on the hypocrisy.
Not all Republicans support the candidates' proposed solutions. Senator Ted Cruz warned that banning diesel exports could backfire. The U.S. refines more imported diesel than domestic supply, Cruz explained, meaning an export ban could face retaliatory trade restrictions and ultimately raise prices further. This split within the GOP—between Trump-endorsed candidates seeking political cover and established senators defending the administration—reveals how the war has fractured the party's traditional unity on foreign policy.
Publishers
32
Articles
233
Reach
265