UEFA and member associations pressure Infantino to resign after privatizing World Cup rights

Governance duty under Article 10.3: The Guardian notes FIFA's Article 10.3 requires the president to ensure FIFA’s objectives and a positive image are fostered, and to promote friendly relations within FIFA; critics argue Infantino’s privatization plan breached these duties and damaged FIFA’s credibility.
UEFA’s no-confidence plan: The Telegraph reports that UEFA and all 55 member associations are prepared to back a motion to remove Infantino from office if he refuses to resign, signaling broad cross-continental pressure for leadership change.
UEFA boycott pledge: Reports indicate UEFA and its 55 member associations unanimously voted to boycott all FIFA competitions if the proposed private-rights sale went ahead, underscoring the scale of opposition to the plan.
Plan abandoned amid backlash and calls for reform: Infantino announced the Forward Enterprise will not proceed after widespread criticism, with FIFA saying the project created divisions that undermined its objectives.
Internal dissent over the project: FIFA COO Kevin Lamour described the plan as “the project of one person,” saying staff were deceived by Infantino’s handling, highlighting governance concerns within FIFA.
UEFA has demanded that FIFA President Gianni Infantino resign — and threatened a formal vote to remove him if he refuses. The Guardian reports that Infantino was forced to abandon his plan to sell off portions of the World Cup to private investors, but critics say the damage to FIFA's credibility is already done.
Idman.biz reports that all 55 UEFA member associations, including Azerbaijan, are prepared to back a no-confidence motion against Infantino. The move signals the broadest cross-continental push to change FIFA's leadership since the Sepp Blatter scandal a decade ago.
Infantino's plan, called FIFA Forward Enterprise, would have sold stakes in World Cup commercial rights to private investors. The idea triggered a fierce backlash across global football. UEFA and its 55 member associations voted unanimously to boycott all FIFA competitions if the plan went ahead.
Infantino eventually scrapped the plan. FIFA said the project had "created divisions" that undermined its own objectives. But for UEFA and others, abandoning the plan was not enough. They want Infantino gone.
The rebellion is not just external. NBC26 reports that a senior FIFA official resigned directly over the World Cup sell-off plan. FIFA's own COO, Kevin Lamour, described it as "the project of one person." He said staff were deceived by how Infantino handled the whole process.
That kind of internal dissent is rare at FIFA. It points to a deeper governance problem — not just a single bad policy. Critics argue Infantino ran the plan without proper oversight or consent from the broader organization.
The Guardian notes that FIFA's Article 10.3 requires the president to protect the organization's image and promote good relations within FIFA. Critics argue the privatization plan directly broke those duties. They say Infantino put commercial deals ahead of football's wider interests.
Point Blank News reports that British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has also called for Infantino's removal. Burnham accused FIFA of putting "commercial interests ahead of the future of the game." His intervention shows the crisis has moved beyond football and into politics.
UEFA is now pushing Infantino toward one of two outcomes: resign voluntarily or face a no-confidence vote. Idman.biz says all 55 European associations are aligned behind this position. That is a level of unity rarely seen in global football governance.
Despite the pressure, some reports suggest Infantino may still seek re-election. Sporting News notes the clash between his leadership ambitions and the growing momentum for change. FIFA watchers say the coming weeks will decide whether the organization gets the clean break it needs — or stays stuck in the same cycle of scandal and delay.
Publishers
22
Articles
36
Reach
58