Wounded Iran Strike Survivors Allege US Military Medical Failures and Care Shortages

The six soldiers killed at Port Shuaiba were providing logistical support for critical supplies, according to the reports.
One wounded soldier, Lincón, suffered shrapnel injuries to his jaw and neck, including damage to a vertebral artery that supplies blood to the brain and put him at risk of stroke. He said the injury was not considered serious enough by the Army for admission to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany.
The AP also interviewed 13 soldiers, mostly officers serving in key roles or familiar with senior-level briefings; many said the Pentagon had not taken Iranian threats seriously enough as it launched Operation Epic Fury. Several spoke on the record, which the report described as rare for active-duty troops.
The reports say years of drawdowns and disinvestment left the region without any major U.S.-run medical facilities.
Nine wounded U.S. soldiers are alleging that military commanders underestimated the Iranian threat and failed to provide adequate medical care after a March 1 drone strike killed six troops at Port Shuaiba in Kuwait, Associated Press reported. The injured service members say their wounds were not promptly recognized and that administrative barriers blocked follow-up treatment, even as one soldier with a damaged artery faced stroke risk.
The dispute highlights a weakened U.S. medical presence across the Middle East after years of budget cuts and facility closures. The Pentagon says the care was appropriate, while the Army has declined public comment pending a formal investigation and family briefings, Pilot Online reported.
Soldier Lincón suffered shrapnel wounds to his jaw and neck that damaged a vertebral artery—a major blood vessel supplying the brain. The injury put him at immediate risk of stroke. Yet Army medical staff did not deem it serious enough to admit him to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, the primary U.S. military hospital for overseas casualties.
His case exemplifies a broader pattern Associated Press documented: initial evaluations failed to catch the severity of multiple wounds. Soldiers describe gaps between what they experienced and how military doctors initially assessed their conditions.
The March 1 strike occurred as the U.S. military footprint in the Middle East had shrunk significantly. Budget cuts eliminated major U.S.-run medical facilities across the region, leaving troops with fewer treatment options nearby. When the drone strike hit, evacuation plans proved inadequate for the scale of casualties.
Associated Press spoke with 13 additional soldiers—mostly officers in senior roles—who said Pentagon leadership had not taken Iranian threats seriously before launching Operation Epic Fury. The lack of preparedness extended to medical readiness, compounding the crisis when the attack came.
The Department of Defense maintains that medical care following the strike was appropriate and met military standards. Officials declined to publicly address specific allegations while an Army investigation remains underway. Families are expected to receive a full briefing on the findings.
Active-duty soldiers speaking on the record about military failures is rare, Associated Press noted. The willingness of nine wounded troops to come forward suggests deep concern about both the threat assessment failures and the medical response that followed the deadliest Iranian attack since the conflict began.
Publishers
12
Articles
247
Reach
259