X challenges Australia's eSafety Commissioner powers, citing extraterritorial reach and international law clash

The proposed changes would raise the maximum fine to A$99 million, effectively doubling the sanction cap.
The amendments would expand the eSafety Commissioner’s powers to compel information, potentially from parties outside Australia due to being 'affiliated' with a company, and current powers to demand documents from third-party providers (like age-verification firms) are limited.
A U.S. congressional committee has asked the eSafety Commissioner to testify, accusing her of imperiling American free speech.
X argues the amendments could conflict with international legal principles and raise international comity concerns because of their extraterritorial reach.
Elon Musk's X has formally challenged Australia's plan to tighten enforcement of its world-first under-16 social media ban, warning the changes could clash with international law. The platform submitted that proposed expansions to the eSafety Commissioner's powers would reach far beyond Australia's borders, affecting people and companies that have no direct presence in the country, according to Wired.
The proposed amendments would more than double the maximum fine companies can face, raising the cap to A$99 million. They would also let the eSafety Commissioner demand information from parties overseas simply because they are "affiliated" with a regulated company, Free Malaysia Today reported.
X argues the amendments go too far. The platform says compelling information from people outside Australia — purely because of a corporate affiliation — raises serious due process and privacy concerns. It also argues the move conflicts with international comity, a legal principle that says countries should respect each other's laws and sovereignty, according to Wired.
Currently, the eSafety Commissioner's powers to demand documents from third-party providers — such as age-verification firms — are limited. The new rules would close that gap. X says that expanded reach is where the legal problem lies, Free Malaysia Today reported.
Australia passed its under-16 social media ban late last year, making it the first country in the world to do so. The law requires platforms to stop children under 16 from creating accounts. But eSafety has signaled that its current tools are not strong enough to actually enforce the ban against non-compliant platforms, according to The Guild.
The proposed changes are meant to fix that gap. A Senate hearing and committee report are still to come before any final decision is made. eSafety has said it may pursue enforcement actions against several platforms, but has not yet named them publicly.
The dispute has caught the attention of Washington. A US congressional committee has asked Australia's eSafety Commissioner to testify before it. The committee accused her of threatening American free speech and undermining global norms, according to Wired.
Musk himself previously flagged the issue on X, amplifying criticism that Australia's rules could set a dangerous precedent for internet regulation worldwide. Critics in both countries argue that giving a national regulator power to compel foreign nationals raises questions that go well beyond child safety, Rато Pati reported.
The fine increase is one of the most debated parts of the proposal. Raising the cap to A$99 million is designed to make non-compliance too costly to ignore. For large platforms like X, Meta, or TikTok, current fines are small enough to absorb without changing behavior, according to The Guild.
Industry and government officials are now weighing how tough enforcement can get before it starts harming cross-border digital trade. X's submission argues that balance has already been lost. The Senate process will determine whether Australia presses ahead or pulls back, Free Malaysia Today reported.
Publishers
12
Articles
86
Reach
98