Alcohol Study Contradicts Guidelines.
Large-scale study reveals 1 in 25 death risk for casual drinkers, challenging federal guidelines.
Anonymous
Even casual drinkers face a 1-in-25 chance of dying from an alcohol-related cause, according to a sweeping new study published June 8, 2026, in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. The finding applies to men who follow current U.S. federal guidelines — two drinks per day — and directly contradicts decades of official health advice.
The review, called the *Alcohol Intake and Health Study*, synthesized data from more than 7,200 peer-reviewed articles. It found no safe level of alcohol consumption. Researchers say the study was commissioned by the U.S. government to help shape the upcoming 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines — making its conclusions especially disruptive to current policy, News-Medical.Net reported.
The 1-in-25 Number That Rewrites the Rules
The study gives Americans a clear risk ladder. Drinking 14 drinks per week — the current U.S. limit for men — carries a 4% lifetime risk of dying from an alcohol-caused disease, according to Drugs.com. Drop to 8.5 drinks per week and the risk falls to 1 in 100. Cut further to seven drinks per week — about one per day, the limit for women — and the risk drops to just 1 in 1,000.
Alcohol is now linked to more than 200 health conditions and causes roughly 178,000 deaths per year in the U.S. alone, News-Medical.Net reported. Lead author Dr. Kevin Shield of the University of Toronto put it plainly: "Even low levels of alcohol use come with health risks, and that risk continues to increase the more someone drinks," the ASCO Post reported.
Decades of 'Moderate Drinking Is Fine' Were Built on a Flawed Study Design
For years, scientists believed moderate drinkers lived longer than non-drinkers. That idea was called the "J-shaped curve." But researchers now say those older studies had a serious flaw: many non-drinkers had actually quit drinking because they were already sick. This made moderate drinkers look healthier by comparison — a problem researchers call "sick-quitter bias," News-Medical.Net explained.
The new study used cause-specific mathematical modeling to correct for that bias. Once fixed, the supposed heart benefits of light drinking disappeared entirely. Dr. Katherine M. Keyes of Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health was direct: the research found "no protective effect of drinking was observed even at low levels," Columbia University reported.
Canada Already Cut Its Limit — the U.S. May Be Next
The U.S. is not the first to face this reckoning. In January 2023, Canada slashed its recommended drinking limit to just two drinks per week — a fraction of the American guideline, the Advisory Board noted. That move was seen as a preview of where alcohol science was heading. The new study gives U.S. regulators hard numbers to act on.
Federal agencies including the USDA and HHS are now under pressure to revise the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines. But change is slow. Lobbying from the $250 billion U.S. alcohol industry and the complexity of multi-agency policy mean official guidelines often lag well behind the science, News-Medical.Net reported.
Public Health Groups Push for Warning Labels on Alcohol
In response to the study, public health advocates are calling for mandatory warning labels on alcohol containers — similar to those required on cigarette packs. Dr. Priscilla Martinez-Matyszczyk of the Alcohol Research Group noted that nearly half of Americans drink monthly without knowing the specific mortality risks they are taking on, the Public Health Institute reported.
Researchers also flagged women as a particularly high-risk group. Women who drink one drink per day face a significantly higher chance of dying from liver cancer compared to those who abstain entirely, the Advisory Board reported. The shift in expert messaging is now clear: from "drink in moderation" to "less is best" — with no truly safe amount.
Sentiment
NeutralNEGATIVENEUTRALPOSITIVE
Publishers
9
Articles
8
Reach
9
Topics
A
AnonymousAuthor
